Cit vs hindustan bulk carriers

WebJan 16, 2024 · The reference by the AO to the case of Hindustan Bulk Carriers (supra) is misplaced since in that case block assessment was not involved. In any case this decision was disapproved by a five member bench in the case of Brij Lal v CIT 194 Taxman 566 (SC). In Brij Lal (supra) section 234A, 234B and 234C were held to be applicable to … WebFeb 6, 2024 · Explaining this principle, Hon’ble Supreme Court has, in the case of CIT Vs Hindustan Bulk Carriers [(2003) 259 ITR 449 (SC)], has observed that “A construction which reduces the statute to a futility has to be avoided” and that “A statute or any enacting provision therein must be so construed as to make it effective and operative on ...

Orchid Pharma Limited vs. DCIT (ITAT Chennai) – itatonline.org

WebAug 15, 2015 · Sathe has appeared in a number of landmark matters in the Supreme Court and the High Courts such as CIT vs. Hindustan Bulk Carriers (2002) 258 ITR 399 (SC), CIT vs. Gabriel India Ltd (1989) 179 ITR 54 (Bom), CIT vs. LIC Housing Finance Ltd (2014) 367 ITR 458 (Bom) etc. He was designated Senior Advocate on 23.07.2005 and was … WebIn fact, in the facts of the appellant's case, the decision of Apex Court is squarely applicable wherein no uncertain term the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Hindustan Bulk Carriers {(259 ITR 449) (SC)} have held that "on the portion of income determined by the Commission not disclosed to the A.O., interest is to be charged u/s ... chuckit ball launcher dog toy https://pillowtopmarketing.com

CRITICAL STUDY OF THE DOCTRINE OF HARMONIOUS …

Web5 CIT v. H ind u st aB lk re , (2 0 3) S C 5 7, p .4 6 Ibid. 7 S t a e of U .Pv R nus g rw C , AIR 19 8 SC 73 , p .5 8 Co l ec trf n aEx is J p uv .R gh (I d) L , JT 2 0 (7) SC 9, p .1 9 O SB … WebJun 28, 2012 · That is clearly an absurdity. As to what should be done in such a situation, we find guidance from the observations made by Honble Supreme Court, in the case CIT vs Hindustan Bulk Carriers Ltd (259 ITR 449), as follows: … WebDec 17, 2002 · Hindustan Bulk Carriers Arijit Pasayat, J.— A question of seminal importance relating to the period for which interest in terms of Section 234-B of the … desiner backpacks for functionality

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW MANAGEMENT

Category:Judicial Doctrines - Drishti IAS

Tags:Cit vs hindustan bulk carriers

Cit vs hindustan bulk carriers

M/S. Vedika Nut Craft Pvt. Ltd., ... vs Dcit, New Delhi on 24 July, 2024

WebNov 6, 2024 · As observed by Hon‟ble Supreme Court, in the case of CIT Vs Hindustan Bulk Carriers [(2003) 259 ITR 449 (SC)], “A construction which reduces the statute to a futility has to be avoided. A statute or any enacting provision therein must be so construed as to make it effective and operative on the principle expressed in maxim us res magi’s ... WebDec 17, 2000 · Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S Hindustan Bulk Carriers on 17 December, 2000 Author: Dharmadhikari Bench: D.M. Dharmadhikari. CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 7966-67 of 1996 PETITIONER: Commissioner of Income Tax RESPONDENT: M/s …

Cit vs hindustan bulk carriers

Did you know?

WebDec 21, 2024 · Hindustan Bulk Carrier: “While interpreting, the court has a duty to avoid a “head-on clash” at all costs between two sections of the same act The interpretation should be done such that the provision of one section doesn’t defeat the purpose of another unless it is impossible to effect a reconciliation between them. WebCommissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S. Hindustan Bulk Carriers on 17 December, 2002 Author: A Pasayat Bench: Arijit Pasayat CASE NO.: PETITIONER: Commissioner of …

WebOct 8, 2002 · Hindustan Bulk Carriers: Court: SUPREME COURT: Relevant Act: Income-tax: Date of Order: 08/10/2002 : Judgment: View Judgment: Keyword Tags: … WebThe Supreme Court laid down five principles of rule of Harmonious Construction in the landmark case of CIT v Hindustan Bulk Carriers: 1. The courts must avoid a head on …

WebOct 11, 2024 · CIT vs Hindustan Bulk Carriers … but can waive or reduce interest u/s 220(2A) if prescribed conditions are satisfied. Rectification of order: section 245D(6B): Within a period of 6 months from the end of month in which order was passed; http://www.ijlljs.in/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Harmonious-Construction.pdf

WebJan 24, 2024 · In the case of CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers 2003, 5 guidelines focusing rule of harmonious construction have been directed by Supreme Court of India. Doctrine of Eclipse. ... In the case of Rattan Lal vs. State of Punjab AIR 1965 SC 444, on 31-May-1962, ‘A’ boy of 16yr found guilty of an offence and was awarded imprisonment of 6 months ...

WebAug 30, 2024 · In the landmark case of CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers (2003) the supreme court laid down five principles of rule of harmonious construction: The courts … chuckit ball medium vs tennis ballWebIn CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers, the supreme court stated five important principles and they are: The courts must avoid a clash on contradicting provisions and they … desinfect heise downloadWebHindustan Bulk Carriers [2003] 259 ITR 449(SC) and in the case of CIT v. Sant Ram Mangat Ram Jewellers [2003] 264 ITR 564(SC)], this ground is dismissed. However, the AO may allow consequential relief ,if any, while giving effect to this order desiner italian leather sofaWebJun 19, 2015 · The A.O., however, referred to Apex Court judgment in case of CIT vs. Hindustan Bulk Carriers and charged interest. 5. The assessee preferred an appeal to CIT(A) and it was held that the interest could not be levied in block assessment by placing reference to section 158BF of the Act. Apex Court judgment in case of CIT vs. … desinfect hand\\u0026skinWebof Income Tax vs. Hindustan Bulk Carrier, the application can be seen in several landmark judgements before that, both pre – independence and post – independence. Several judgements have applied these principles implicitly and the same is reflected in their interpretation of legislations while adjudicating disputes. 1. Venkataramana Devaru v. desi new orleansWeb1 CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers, (2003) 3 SCC 57, p. 74. 2) The provision of one section cannot be used to defeat the provision contained in another unless the court, despite all its effort, is unable to find a way to reconcile their differences.2 3) When it is impossible to completely reconcile the differences in contradictory provisions, the ... desinfection azoteWebIn CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers, the supreme court stated five important principles and they are: The courts must avoid a conflict between conflicting provisions by construing the opposing clauses in a way that harmonises them. desiner handbags and travel.combag