웹Bandhua Mukti Morcha V. Union Of India & Ors (5) Author: Lakhwinder Ogra Read related entries on Uncategorized, Long Read, Part 5 of Sentences 웹2024년 3월 26일 · Bandhua Mukti Morcha (BMM) ... This followed a 1984 Supreme Court decision in a case brought by BMM. Other cases on bonded labour brought to the …
Law Corner - Page 10 of 259 - An Online Law Learning Platform.
웹2024년 4월 9일 · Constitution is not attracted to the instant case as no. fundamental right of the petitioner or of the workmen. referred to in the petition is infringed; (2) A letter. … 웹Public Interest Litigation in India is a new idea, and for the growing public dependence on the legal process to provide social remedy, it has opened up unlimited sectors by liberalising and/or extending the norms of locus standi. strava turned of heart monitor
Important Judgements on PIL (Public Interest Litigation)
웹2024년 8월 30일 · Equivalent Citation- 1978 AIR 597, 1978 SCR (2) 621 Petitioner: Maneka Gandhi Respondent: Union of India Date of Judgment: 25/01/1978 BENCH: Hameedullah Beg (CJI), Y.V.Chandrachud, P.N Bhagwati, V.R. Krishna Iyer, N.L.Untwalia, S.M. Fazal Ali& P.S.Kailasam. Background. The Supreme Court in Satwant Singh held that right to travel … 웹2015년 11월 4일 · Citations: (1984) 3 SCC 161: AIR 1984 SC 802 Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India This Supreme Court aptly observed that “It is fundamental right of everyone in this country, assured under the interpretation given to Art. 21 by this Court in Francis Mullin’s (1981) 1 SCC 608: AIR 1981SC 746, case-to live with 웹This Court in Band- hua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India, [1984] 3 SCC 161 aptly observed:- "It is the fundamental right of everyone in this country, assured under the interpretation given to Article 21 by this Court in Francis Mullin's case--[1981] 1 SCC 608--to live with human dignity, free from exploitation. round kettle drum coffee table australia